ASIA

Radio’s Recall Based vs Observed Behaviour Research Debate

Content from BPROver the last few years there has been some debate about the relative merits of recall-based research vs observed behaviour data.Sadly, the debate often degenerates into a chest thumping exercise about which is superior depending on where your vested interest lies.  The observed behaviour tribe like to portray recall -based research as old fashioned and expensive, while the sample-based tribe tend to highlight the obscure sample integrity of digital and the inability of observed behaviour analytics to see outside of the box or into someone’s mind.

The reality is that both forms of research have their place and the issue is not whether one is “old, new, better or bad” but rather which tool most accurately serves what you are trying to achieve.Before we go too far down the rabbit hole it is worth defining the difference between the two methodologies for the purposes of this article.Recall based research is where questions are asked of a stratified representative sample of the marketplace.  The responses to those questions will generally cover things such as what people remember of their listening behaviour across the day/week, what they think about your radio station and your competitors and what their listening preference are (likes and dislikes).Observed behaviour data in the case of radio generally means transactional data siphoned from digital listening streams, particularly your station stream.  It normally measures such things as when users log in and log out and how long they listen for. The amount of demographic profile information available varies depending on the sophistication of your streaming providers analytics and log-in mechanics.  Observed behaviour data for podcast downloads can also be part of this.Observed behaviour research based on transactional data has been around for a very long time.  In the case of the retail industry since the invention of the cash register.  I recall pouring over millions of transactional records in various retail and FMCG projects prior to joining BPR.  The analysis involved identifying sales trends, optimal price points, credit cards used, customer flow charts and the relationship between sales and display locations or staffing levels. Recall based research in the retail context was about what could not be drawn from the transactional data such as brand insights, advertising recall, the degree of satisfaction with the shopping experience, what needed to be done better and things the customer wanted in the future.When the ability to capture digital transactional data on media and entertainment consumption came along, I was an enthusiast, even serving on one of the early committees involved in developing passive people meters.  Observed behaviour data is very sexy to play with however there is one extremely significant issue with using observed behaviour data in a strategic context for media, particularly radio.  The issue is that radio listening is mostly an emotional transaction.  The essence of radio programming is understanding the emotional transaction between your content and your listeners whether that transaction be good or bad.  The best indicator of that emotional transaction is what your listeners remember of their listening experience, what a listener remembers about your radio station reflects the emotional imprint you made on the listener.  Critically, what a listener remembers about your radio station frames their opinion of your radio station and this is reflected in two fundamental behaviours:
What they subsequently tell other people about (I don’t have to tell you how critical talk of town is)
The likelihood they will tune into your station again at their next radio listening opportunity.
It follows that the best and most effective way to measure the emotional imprint you make with a listener is what that listener recalls about your station.  Recall is the ultimate litmus test of how effective your station has been in triggering an emotional transaction.You may have a radio turned on (or an app open in the background) but that does not mean you are actually listening to that radio station or actively engaged or remembering the experience.  This is what a lot of people miss when arguing the relative merits of recall-based vs observed behaviour data when it comes to media, particularly radio.In the next instalment we will discuss in more granular detail the relative merits of both forms of research and outline the most appropriate situations to use either or both.By Wayne Clouten, BPR […]

US

KBTK Adds New Prescott Frequency

Stone Canyon Media has completed the upgrade and move of 97.1 K246AA Prescott AZ to 107.9 K300DZ. The translator will continue to rebroadcast Conservative Talk “97.1 The Big Talker” KBTK Kachina Village/Flagstaff. On the new 107.9 frequency, K300DZ will operate with 45w/188m from Badger Mountain. The translator and 104.1 K281BE Flagstaff, which rebroadcasts Stone Canyon […] […]

US

FCC Report 9/26: Rhode Island Translator Fined For Operating Nearly Three Years With Expired License

FCC Actions
Diponti Communications LLC has been issued a Notice of Apparent Liability For Forfeiture proposing a $7000 fine.

DiPonti acquired the former 93.5 W228AU North Bennington VT from Brian Dodge’s Harvest Broadcasting in November 2016 just after Dodge had entered into a Consent Decree of his own giving it and other signals a one year conditional license renewal that was due to have a renewal application filed by July 1, 2017.

DiPonti did not file the license renewal for what was moved during the 250 mile waiver period to become 103.1 W276DF Westerly RI rebroadcasting 1230 WBLQ Westerly until September 11, 2020 and filed an STA to continue operations five days later which would’ve been nearly three years after the translator’s license expired. The FCC’s fine is $3000 for failing to timely file a license renewal, while dropping the base $10,000 penalty for operating without a license down to an additional $4000 as Diponti stated it was an inadvertent oversight being unaware of the short-term license renewal as part of its acquisition of the translator.

Martins & Associates, Inc.’s 1000 WKVG Jenkins KY entered into a Consent Decree over multiple violations in its license renewal. WKVG failed to timely file its license renewal applications, failed to submit an EEO Program Report and upload its issues and programs lists to its online public file. As part of the Consent Decree, WKVG has agreed to pay a $4500 civil penalty.

Guillermo Garza’s 1490 KWMC Del Rio TX has been issued a Notice of Apparent Liability For Forfeiture for $3000 for failing to timely file its license renewal application. KWMC’s was due to file its application by April 1, 2021 but did not until May 7.

Nelson Rodriguez’s 100.9 WJES Maysville GA and Radio Vida Incorporado’s 1400 WIDA Carolina PR entered into Consent Decrees over compliance with their public files.

AM Changes
Blount MassCom Christian 1090 WILD Boston seeks to relocate to the site of Real Media Group’s 1300 WJDA Quincy MA with 2.7kW day and 1.8kW critical hours. WILD had been co-located at the site of Delmarva Educational Association’s 1430 WKOX Everett, but that station is in the process of relocating to the site of Salem’s 950 WROL as the current tower is being redeveloped.

New FM CPs
Only one new filing from FCC Auction 109 was made this week […]